1 2025:HHC:836 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CrMMO No.973 of 2024 Decided on : 06.01.2025 Budhi Singh …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate, vice Mr. Bodh Raj Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Mohinder Zharaick and Mr. H.S. Rawat, Addl. Advocates General, with Ms. Ranjana Patial, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Avocate for respondent No.3. Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) Under instructions, learned vice counsel, appearing for the petitioner, has submitted that the petitioner does not want to proceed further with the present case. However, a liberty has been sought to move 2 2025:HHC:836 appropriate application before the appropriate Court i.e. Sessions Judge, Mandi, H.P., for redressal of his grievance. 2. Accordingly, the petitioner is at liberty to move appropriate application, before the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Mandi, H.P. 3. The learned Sessions Judge, Mandi is requested to proceed further, in accordance with law. 4. Consequently, the present application stands dismissed, being not pressed, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Virender Singh) Judge January 06, 2025 Gaurav Thakur