Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21961 (ALL)

PRABHAKIRAN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/7400/2025 · 2025-03-03

Vivek Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30725 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7400 of 2025 Applicant :- Prabhakiran Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Srivastava,Pandey Balkrishna Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned AGA for the State-opposite party and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 15 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, Police Station Sector 126, District Gautam Buddha Nagar during the pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the first information report and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. The applicant is in jail since 24.12.2024 and in case she is enlarged on bail, she will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail and submits that the applicant impersonated as the actual owner of the disputed land and executed the sale deeds. She had forged the Adhar card of the aforesaid person earlier in pursuance of the well thought-out criminal act. A bank account was also opened in the name of the owner of the property by forged documents. Later on, the money was also withdrawn from the said account. 5. After having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused record, this Court prima facie finds that the applicant impersonated as the actual owner of the land and executed the sale deeds. The applicant had also forged the Aadhar Card, PAN card and power of attorney of the aforesaid person. The applicant is the beneficiary of the illicit transaction. The offence is grave. There is likelihood that the applicant committed the offence. At this stage no case for bail is made out. 6. The bail application is, accordingly rejected. 7. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned for information. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Sachin Mishra Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad