Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2196 (ORI)

KRISHNA NAIK v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/12754/2025 · 2026-04-16

Gourishankar Satapathy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.12754 of 2025 Krishna Naik … Petitioner Ms. D. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. S.C. Pradhan, Addl. PP Ms. S. Sahoo, Advocate (informant) CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL)16.04.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. Ms. Deepali Mahapatra, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the present bail application by praying to direct the learned trial Court to examine the victim at the earliest. It is also not disputed that Ms. Sravani Sahoo, learned counsel for the informant submits that the family members of the petitioner is threatening to the family members of the informant, but when a question was posed to her as to why the victim has not been examined, she undertakes to inform the informant to testify in the Court on the next date of trial. 3. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present bail application stands disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty as prayed for and the learned trial Court is requested to examine the victim at the earliest, but in case of the failure of examination of the victim in the trial within 45 days hence, the petitioner would renew his prayer for bail before the learned trial Court. A copy of this order be immediately communicated to the learned trial Court. (G. Satapathy) Judge Jayakrushna