HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2286 of 2024 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case investigation has already been concluded and final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioners, as such, the present writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Learned AGA as well as learned counsel for respondent no.3 do not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 11, 2025 Subham Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Srijan Pandey, Swetashwa Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Jalaj Kumar Tripathi (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Parminder And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBHAM KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SUBHAM KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad