PRACHURJYA BORBORUAH v. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF OF FOREST AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE AND 4 ORS.
PIL/1/2025 · 2025-01-09
Kalyan Rai Surana, Kaushik Goswami
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21958 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21958 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010269742024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : PIL/1/2025 PRACHURJYA BORBORUAH SON OF BIJON BORBORUAH, R.O.- HOUSE NO. 308, BELTOLA BASISTHA ROAD, BELTOLA, GUWAHATI- 781028, P.O.- BELTOLA, P.S.- HATIGAON, DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM. VERSUS THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF OF FOREST AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE AND 4 ORS.
ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, ARANYA BHAWAN, PANJABARI, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP(M), PIN- 781037.
2:THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER ASSAM STATE ZOO DIVISION ASSAM STATE CUM BOTANICAL GARDEN ZOO ROAD
JAPORIGOG GUWAHATI ASSAM- 781005.
3:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT FORESTS AND CLIMATE CHANGE
GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND
Page No.# 2/3 KOHIMA NAGALAND- 797001.
4:THE DIRECTOR NAGALAND ZOOLOGICAL PARK RANGAPAHAR DIMAPUR NAGALAND- 797001.
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ITANAGAR ZOOLOGICAL PARK ITANAGAR CAPITAL COMPLEX
GOVERNMENT OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH
CHANDAN NAGAR ITANAGAR
ARUNACHAL PRADESH- 791113 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P BORBORUAH, PETITIONER IN PERSON Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST, GA, NAGALAND,GA, AP
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 10.01.2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. P. Borboruah, petitioner-in-person. Mr. K. P. Pathak, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2, Ms. T. Khro, learned Additional Advocate General for respondent Nos. 3 & 4, Mr. Arun Chandraw, learned Senior Government Advocate for respondent no. 5 are present. It prima facie appears that the PIL does not comply with the requirement of the Guwahati High Court (Public Interest Litigation) Rules, 2011. Accordingly, the petitioner-in-person seeks liberty to withdraw this PIL and to
Page No.# 3/3 approach this Court again. Prayer is allowed. Matter stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant