DHARMENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
NA529/347/2025 · 2025-05-18
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21958 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21958 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:83620 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 347 of 2025 Applicant :- Dharmendra Pratap Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Complaint Case No. 1479 of 2020, W.S.C. No. 1218 of 2020 (Misc. Case No. 3530 of 2019), Computer No. 2819 of 2019 under Sections 304A, 384, 385, 120B, 504, 506 415 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Bulandshahr pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahar expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant before this Court is the complainant in the aforesaid case. It is further submitted that after recording the evidence under Section 200 and 202 Cr.P.C. the Court passed an order for the concerned S.O. to make an inquiry from the police station concerned but however, the said report is still awaited. It is further submitted that the Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. The aforesaid order for inquiry was passed under Section 202(1) Cr.P.C. in the year 2022 but it is a matter of utter surprise that as yet no report has been given by the police. The criminal Court have ample power provided under the relevant law to procure the report, which has to be sent by the police. 7. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is expected to invoke its powers and ensure the police report to be filed as expeditiously
as possible and thereafter all the efforts shall be made for the expeditious of the present complaint case preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, keeping in view the heavy work load in the said Court. 8.
It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 9. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 19.5.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad