MOSLEM UDDIN @ MALOM AND 9 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
I.A.(Crl.)/1255/2024 · 2025-08-31
Kaushik Goswami, Michael Zothankhuma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21954 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21954 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/5 GAHC010269332024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1255/2024 MOSLEM UDDIN @ MALOM AND 9 ORS S/O. LATE DAROG ALI, VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 2: NAWSHAD ALI @ NAUSHAD ALI S/O. LATE SAMIR UDDIN @ SOMIR UDDIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 3: ABBAS ALI S/O. LATE BAHAL UDDIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 4: KHOYBAR ALI @ KHAYBAR ALI S/O. LATE DAROG ALI VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 5: INSAB ALI @ INACHAB ALI S/O. LATE BAHAL UDDIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 6: SOHID ALI @ SHAHIDUR RAHMAN S/O. LATE SOMIR UDDIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 7: HAJRAT ALI S/O. HUSSAIN ALI @ HUSSEIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 8: SADEK ALI S/O. LATE ESAHOQUE ALI SHEIKH VILL.- DUBACHURI PART- II 9: GOLAP SHEIKH @ GOLAP UDDIN @ GOLAMANABI SHEIKH S/O. LATE NURAL AMIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I
Page No.# 2/5 10: ALOM SK @ ALAM ALI SHEIKH S/O- LT. AHAILA SK VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I
ALL ARE P.O.- BARKANDA P.S.- BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783348 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BORA, MR. V A CHOWDHURY,MR A.K. MOLLAH,MR. M HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Crl.A./433/2024 MOSLEM UDDIN @ MALOM AND 9 ORS S/O. LATE DAROG ALI VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 2: NAWSHAD ALI @ NAUSHAD ALI S/O. LATE SAMIR UDDIN @ SOMIR UDDIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 3: ABBAS ALI S/O. LATE BAHAL UDDIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 4: KHOYBAR ALI @ KHAYBAR ALI S/O. LATE DAROG ALI VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 5: INSAB ALI @ INACHAB ALI
Page No.# 3/5 S/O. LATE BAHAL UDDIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 6: SOHID ALI @ SHAHIDUR RAHMAN S/O. LATE SOMIR UDDIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 7: HAJRAT ALI S/O. HUSSAIN ALI @ HUSSEIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 8: SADEK ALI S/O. LATE ESAHOQUE ALI SHEIKH VILL.- DUBACHURI PART- II 9: GOLAP SHEIKH @ GOLAP UDDIN @ GOLAMANABI SHEIKH S/O. LATE NURAL AMIN VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I 10: ALOM SK @ ALAM ALI SHEIKH S/O- LT. AHAILA SK VILL.- BOALKAMURI PART-I
ALL ARE P.O.- BARKANDA P.S.- BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN-783348. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. A M BORA Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR.
JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER
Page No.# 4/5 Date : 01/09/2025 (Michael Zothankhuma, J)
1. Heard Mr. A. Bora, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. V.A. Chowdhury, learned counsel for the applicant nos. 1 to 10, who are amongst the 13 accused persons who have been convicted by the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bilasipara, Dhubri, Assam, in Sessions Case No. 108/2001 under section 302/325/323/149 IPC, vide judgement dated 05/10/2024 and sentence order dated 07/10/2024. 2. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been in jail since the impugned judgement dated 05/10/2024. He submits that he is praying for suspension of sentence in respect of applicant nos. 4, 6, 7, 9 and 10 only. He further submits that as the eye witnesses to the incident i.e. PWs- 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 & 15 have not identified the applicant nos. 4, 6, 7, 9 and 10, as the persons who had assaulted the deceased persons, the applicant nos. 4, 6, 7, 9 and 10 should be released on bail after suspending the sentence inflicted upon them, in pursuance of the impugned judgement dated 05/10/2024. 3. Ms. A. Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, admits that the prosecution witnesses have not made a mention of the applicant nos. 4, 6, 7 9 and 10, as the persons who had assaulted the deceased persons during their evidence. 4. We have heard the counsels for the parties. 5. This is an application under section 430 BNSS for suspending the sentence inflicted upon the applicants, pursuant to the impugned judgement
Page No.# 5/5 dated 05/10/2024. 6. On considering the fact that the applicant nos. 4, 6, 7, 9 and 10 have not been identified by the eye witnesses as the persons who assaulted the deceased persons, we are of the view that the applicants should be released on bail. Accordingly, the applicant no. 4 (Khoybor Ali @ Khaybar Ali), applicant no. 6 (Sohid Ali @ Shahidur Rahman), applicant no. 7 (Hajrat Ali), applicant no.
9 (Golap Sheikh @ Golap Uddin @ Golamanabi Sheikh) and applicant No. 10 (Alom Sk @ Alam Ali Sheikh) are released on bail, on furnishing a Bail Bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) each, with one surety each of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bilasipara, Dhubri, Assam. 7. Consequently, the impugned sentence order dated 07/10/2024 in sessions case No. 108/2001, in so far as it relates to the applicant nos. 4, 6, 7, 9 & 10, is hereby suspended. 8. IA is according disposed off. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant