APHC010310312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15795/2025 Between: 1. ADIVISHNU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LATE SRIHARI RAO AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O SURAYAPALEM VILLAGE, GOLLAPUDI MANDAL, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 2. ADIVISHNU MAHESH, S/O LATE SRIHARI RAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O SURAYAPALEM VILLAGE, GOLLAPUDI MANDAL, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 3. ADIVISHNU SIVALEELA, W/O SRINIVASA RAO AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O SURAYAPALEM VILLAGE, GOLLAPUDI MANDAL, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. ADIVISHNU RAJA RAJESWARI, W/O MAHESH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O SURAYAPALEM VILLAGE, GOLLAPUDI MANDAL, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THULLUR POLICE STATION, THULLUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. NUTHAKKI NAGA KISHORE, S/O LATE SRIRAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 1-114, MANDADAM VILLAGE, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent, as well as harassing the petitioners by summoning them to the police station to settle the dispute in favor of the unofficial respondent, and threatening them with false cases if they fails to comply, as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3RD Respondent to cease any interference in the civil dispute between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent and to refrain from harassing threatening the petitioners and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PILLI SUNDEEP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PILLI SUNDEEP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent No.3 is interfering in a civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.4. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that respondent No.3 is not interfering in the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.4. 3. Considering the same, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition at the admission stage by directing respondent No.3 not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.4 without following the due process of law. 4. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 30.06.2025 ANS 4 241 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15795/2025 Date: 30.06.2025 ANS