229 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRR(F)-88-2019 Date of Decision: 19.05.2025 Amit Bansal .… Petitioner Versus Kriti Bansal ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. Vishavjeet, Advocate for Mr. Tanvir S. Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tushar, Advocate for Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate for the respondent. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (ORAL) 1. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that the present revision petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 15.01.2019 passed by learned Family Court, Gurugram whereby interim maintenance has been granted to the respondent/wife whereas now the matter has already been compromised between the parties and the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. has also been withdrawn by the respondent/wife. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that in view of the aforesaid factual position so stated by learned counsel for the respondent, nothing survives in the present revision petition and has prayed for withdrawal of the same. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. 19.05.2025 (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) Bhumika JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No 2. Whether reportable: Yes/No Bhumika Bhati 2025.05.20 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh