Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21952 (AP)

KOTA ANANDA RAO v. DHAYANACHANDRA H M

CC/1962/2022 · 2025-07-16

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010309682022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1962/2022 Between: 1. KOTA ANANDA RAO, S/O LAKSHMAIAH AGED 53 YEARS OCC AGRICULTURE R/O 6-44 VANUKURU VILLAGE PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. DHAYANACHANDRA H M, THE SUB COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. DR P LAKSHMI NARA NARASIMHAM, THE COMMISSIONER, CRDA VIJAYAWADA AMARAVATI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY LENIN CENTER, BESIDE APSARA THEATRE, GOVERNOR PET, VIJAYAWADA- 520002 3. V VIMA DEVI, THE MANDAL DIVISIONAL OFFICER PENAMALUR PENAMALUR MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH 4. M P N PRASAD, THE SECRETARY VANUKURU PANCHAYATH VANUKURU, VILLAGE PENAMALUR MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue notice to the respondents/contemnors herein, and punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, for wilfully and deliberately flouting the orders of this Honourable Court dated 05-10-2020 passed in WP. No 17908 of 2020, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V VENKATA NAGA RAJU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI 2. 3. ; The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 05.10.2020 passed in W.P.No.17908 of 2020. 2. Sri N.Rupeswar, learned counsel representing Sri V.Venkata Naga Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in the contempt have been complied with and prayed to close the contempt. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 17th July, 2025 RKS