Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2195 (UTT)

AMIT KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/193/2023 · 2025-05-20

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.193 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sushil Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted on 04.10.2020 against both the petitioners. 4. In such view of the matter, present petition is dismissed as infructuous. 5. However, it would be open to the petitioners to challenge the charge-sheet, if any, in appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. 6. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 20.05.2025 Ravi