Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21948 (AP)

GUDIMETLA SATTHI REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/15694/2025 · 2025-06-29

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010310432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 15694/2025 Between: 1. GUDIMETLA SATTHI REDDY, S/O.LATE RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O.PEDABHEEMPALLI VILLAGE, DEVIPATNAM MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE (TW.LTR-II) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ADDITIONAL AGENT TO THE GOVERNMENT, RAMPACHODAVARAM, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, (TRIBAL WELFARE,) RAMPACHODAVARAM, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 4. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR TRIBAL WELFARE, DEVIPATNAM MANDAL, ALLURI SEETHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. 5. PALATEERDAPU AJAY, S/O.LATE LAXRNINARAYANA, R/O.THANTIKONDA VILLAGE, GOKAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. PALATEERDAPU AKASH, S/O.LATE LAXRNINARAYANA, R/O.THANTIKONDA VILLAGE, GOKAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. Page 2 of 4 SRS,J W.P.No.15694 of 2025 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS to declare the action of the 2ND respondent in not disposing of the appeal in CMA No.147/2005 which was remanded by the respondent to conduct an enquiry afresh in respect of the petitioners land to an extent of Ac. 1.08 cents in Sy.No.42 of Pedabheempalli Village and Mandal, Alluri Seetharama Raju District as wholly illegal arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 2ND respondent to dispose of the CMA No.147/2005 in the interest of justice and to and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2nd respondent to dispose of the appeal in CMA No. 147/2005 in the interest of justice and to and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUSUDI BABJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition is that respondent No.2 is not disposing of the appeal filed vide C.M.A.No.147 of 2005. 2. Heard Sri M. Babji, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rama Krishna, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare, appeared for respondents 1 to 4. Notice of respondents 5 & 6 is dispensed with since no adverse orders are passed against the right and interest of respondents 5 & 6. Page 3 of 4 SRS,J W.P.No.15694 of 2025 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that C.M.A.No.147 of 2005 is pending on the file of respondent No.2. However, the same has not been disposed of. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted the instructions of Project Officer, ITDA, Rampachodavaram and would submit that respondent No.2 will dispose of the C.M.A.No.147 of 2005, within eight (08) weeks by following the procedure. 5. Given the instructions, without touching the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission with the consent of both the learned counsel, directing respondent No.2 to dispose of the C.M.A.No.147 of 2005, strictly as per the law, within eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 30.06.2025 TVN SRS,J W.P.No.15694 of 2025 117 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.15694 OF 2025 Date : 30.06.2025 TVN