Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21944 (GAU)

CHANDAN SAIKIA v. THE BANK OF BARODA AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/8126/2019 · 2025-03-16

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010269422019 2025:GAU-AS:2744 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/8126/2019 CHANDAN SAIKIA S/O- SRI RATNA KANTA SAIKIA, R/O- FLAT NO.100, LANGDON NIWAS, VIP ROAD, SIXMILE, GHY- 781022, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM VERSUS THE BANK OF BARODA AND 3 ORS REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BARODA BHAVAN, R C DUTT ROAD, ALKAPURI, BARODA- 390007, GUJRAT 2:THE REGIONAL HEAD BANK OF BARODA REGIONAL HEAD OFFICE GS ROAD NEAR EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT BUILDING BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI- 781005 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM 3:THE SENIOR BRANCH MANAGER BANK OF BARODA SIX MILE BRANCH NEAR RAHAMAN HOSPITAL VIP ROAD 6TH MILE GUWAHATI- 781022 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM 4:M/S DAVID CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR Page No.# 2/2 H NO. 48 SIX MILE ANANDA NAGAR KHANAPARA GUWAHATI- 78102 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M BISWAS, MS A SAIKIA,MS. B BORA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M DUTTA, MS N NATH BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 17.03.2025 None appears for the petitioners on call. The petitioner’s counsel was absent even on previous occasions when the matter was listed before this Court. It appears from the Lawazima Court order dated 12.08.2024 that the petitioner has also failed to take steps for service of notice upon the respondent no.4 despite the order passed by the Court. Ms. S. Dev, learned counsel is present for the respondent nos.2 and 3. From the record of this case, it is apparent that the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue the matter before this Court any further. This writ petition, therefore, stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant