2025:JHHC:19755 --1-- C.M.P. No. 836 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI C.M.P. No. 836 of 2023 ---- 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Home Department, Government of Jharkhand, Doranda, PO and PS – Doranda, District – Ranchi 2. The Director General of Police, Government of Jharkhand, Doranda, PO and PS – Doranda, District – Ranchi 3. The Inspector General of Police (Personal), Government of Jharkhand, Doranda, PO and PS – Doranda, District – Ranchi 4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personal), Government of Jharkhand, Doranda, PO and PS – Doranda, District – Ranchi .... Petitioners -- Versus -- 1. Shambhu Prasad, S/o Late Vishnu Bhagwan Sahay, R/o – Village – Madhopur Khairi, PO – Waini, District – Samastipur, Bihar at present posted as Steno (ASI), Bariatu, PO and PS – Bariatu, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand 2. Bhuwan Rai, S/o Late Lal Kumar Rai, R/o – H – 172, Arbindo Nagar, PO and PS – Doranda, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand, at present posted as Steno (ASI) 3. Lalan Prasad, S/o Late Raj Ballav Prasad, R/o Mohalla Sri Krishna Nagar, PO and PS – Sri Krishna Nagar, District – Motihari, East Champaran, Bihar at present posted as Steno (ASI) 4. Amir Tanti, S/o Late Ram Tanti, R/o – Govt. Q. No. A/11, Mahila Thana Campus, Shaheed Chowk, PO – GPO, PS – Kotwali, District – Ranchi Jharkhand, at present posted as Assistant Sub Inspector of Police 5. Gopal Chandra Ghoshal, S/o Ram Chandra Ghoshal, R/o Village – Moti Kochwan Lane, Kathalbari, PO – Bari Khanjarpur, PS – Kotwali, District – Bhagalpur, Bihar, at present posted as ASI, Special Branchi, Ranchi 6. Subodh Kumar, S/o Sri Rajendra Sharma, R/o – Village – Khariwa, PO and PS – Ghosi, District – Jahanabad, Bihar, at present posted as ASI, STF, Dhurwa, Ranchi .... Opposite Parties 2025:JHHC:19755 --2-- C.M.P. No. 836 of 2023 ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate For the O.Ps. :- ---- 02/18.07.2025 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the civil review and the contempt proceeding were tagged and in the contempt the order of the writ court has been complied and in view of that the contempt proceeding has dropped. 2. By order dated 31.03.2023, two weeks’ time was allowed to remove the defect, however, inadvertently the defect has not been removed. He submits that the civil review may kindly be restored to its original file. 3. It transpires that the writ court’s order has already been complied and in that view of the matter the contempt proceeding has been dropped, however, in the interest of justice the prayer made in the C.M.P. is allowed and disposed of. 4. Civil Review No.01 of 2022 is hereby restored to its original file. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/