Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21931 (HP)

RAMESHWAR SHARMA AND ORS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/12656/2025 · 2025-08-05

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.12656 of 2025 Decided on: 5th August, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rameshwar Sharma and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Pranav Kaushal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed separate representations to respondent No.3 on 15.06.2025 (Annexure P-7) for the redressal of their grievances raised in this writ petition. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 Petitioners’ grievance is that the representations preferred by them for redressal of their grievances in light of settled legal position have not been adjudicated till date. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners dated 15.06.2025 (Annexure P-7) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 05, 2025 Judge Mukesh