APHC010309722024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: 1. MALAVATHU VENKATESWARLU, S/O.LATE VASARAM, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 2. BHUKYA PAPABAI, W/O.THAVIRYA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.GINJUPALLI VILLAGE, ACHAMPET MANDAL, DISTRICT. 3. MEGAVATHI ESWARI, W/O.HANUMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O.KOLAMKONDATHANDA, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. MALAVATHU DORAJAN, W/O.LATE VASARAM, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 5. MALAVATHU LAKSHMI, W/O.LATE SIVA, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 6. MALAVATHU SUDHAKAR, S/O.LATE SIVA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 7. MALAVATHU BALYA NAI YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. 8. LAHORI TIRUPATHAMMA, W/O.VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O.KAPPALAKUNTA TANDA VILLAGE, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1602/2024 MALAVATHU VENKATESWARLU, S/O.LATE VASARAM, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. BHUKYA PAPABAI, W/O.THAVIRYA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.GINJUPALLI VILLAGE, ACHAMPET MANDAL, MEGAVATHI ESWARI, W/O.HANUMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O.KOLAMKONDATHANDA, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR MALAVATHU DORAJAN, W/O.LATE VASARAM, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, MALAVATHU LAKSHMI, W/O.LATE SIVA, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, NTR DISTRICT. MALAVATHU SUDHAKAR, S/O.LATE SIVA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, MALAVATHU BALYA NAIK, S/O.LATE SIVA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, LAHORI TIRUPATHAMMA, W/O.VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O.KAPPALAKUNTA TANDA VILLAGE, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA MALAVATHU VENKATESWARLU, S/O.LATE VASARAM, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, BHUKYA PAPABAI, W/O.THAVIRYA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.GINJUPALLI VILLAGE, ACHAMPET MANDAL, GUNTUR MEGAVATHI ESWARI, W/O.HANUMA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O.KOLAMKONDATHANDA, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR MALAVATHU DORAJAN, W/O.LATE VASARAM, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, MALAVATHU LAKSHMI, W/O.LATE SIVA, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM MALAVATHU SUDHAKAR, S/O.LATE SIVA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, K, S/O.LATE SIVA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O.JAYANTHIPURAM VILLAGE, JAGGAIAHPET MANDAL, LAHORI TIRUPATHAMMA, W/O.VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O.KAPPALAKUNTA TANDA VILLAGE, 2 MELLACHERUVUMANDAL, SURYAPET DISTRICT, TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. TEJAVATHU RAMULU, S / o. Lakshmana, Aged about 59 years, R/o.Jayanthipuram Village, Jaggaiahpet Mandal, NTR District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the order in I.A.No. 120/2024 in O.S.No.20/2021, dated 20-06-2024 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaggaiahpet IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the order in I.A.No. 120/2024 in O.S.No.20/2021, dated 20-06-2024 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jaggaiahpet pending disposal of the CRP in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU 3 The Court made the following Order: When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw this revision petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 18.09.2025 MDP