Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2191 (JHR)

PRAMOD ALIAS PARMANAND MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/6007/2018 · 2026-06-15

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:22603 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.6007 of 2018 Pramod @ Parmanand Mandal, aged about 54 years, son of Late Tetar Mandal, resident of village Jamuwa, P.O. & P.S. Mohanpur, Sib Division & District Deoghar. …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka,P.O. & P.S. Dumka, District Dumka 3. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar 4. The Settlement Officer, Santhal Pargana, Dumka, P.O. & P.S. Dumka, District Dumka 5. Pran Mandal, s/o Late Aghu Mandal, resident of village Jamuwa, P.O. & P.S. Mohanpur, Sub-Division & District Deoghar 6. Hurni Devi @ Hurmati Mandalain d/o Late Andhia Mandalain & Bhaglu Mandal, w/o Late Sahdeo Mandal, resident of village Bhikhodih, P.O. & P.S. Sarwan (Sonaraithari), Sub Division & District Deoghar. …... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : --------- 07/Dated: 08 th August, 2025 1. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The last order dated 07.03.2024 reads as under :- “No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in- spite of repeated calls. The petitioner is directed to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks, failing which, this writ petition shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench.” 3. Thus, it is quite evident that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is, hereby, dismissed, for want of prosecution. 5. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Ravi-Chandan/-