Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2191 (CHH)

SHYAM KUMAR v. GANDESHWAR

WPC/202/2025 · 2025-01-14

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:2167 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 202 of 2025 1 - Shyam Kumar S/o Late Visambhar Pradhan Aged About 63 Years R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Gandeshwar S/o Khageshwar R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 2 - Parmanand S/o Bihari R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 3 - Kamallochan S/o Bihari R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 4 - Niranjan S/o Bihari R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 5 - Munku S/o Khageshwar R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.01.14 23:39:43 +0530 2 6 - Kangresar S/o Late Narayan R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 7 - Kamlesh S/o Late Narayan R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 8 - Vishakha Wd/o Late Narayan R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 9 - Dukhishyam S/o Padamlochan R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 10 - Mahendra S/o Loknath R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 11 - Trivendra S/o Loknath R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 12 - Taruni S/o Loknath R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 13 - Sarojani Wd/o Loknath R/o Village- Palsapali, Tahsil- Basna, Distt.- Mahasamund, C.G. 14 - Saroj S/o Nato R/o Village - Chiroli, P.S. Gaurman, Tahsil - Jharband, Distt - Bargarh Orisa 15 - Niroj S/o Nato R/o Village - Chiroli, P.S. Gaurman, Tahsil - Jharband, Distt - Bargarh Orisa 16 - Bhumibai D/o Visambhar, W/o Kanhucharan R/o Village Jharband, P.O. And Tahsil - Jharband, Distt - Bargarh Orisa 17 - Sharda D/o Bihari, W/o Sharughan R/o Village Sitapur, Tahsil - Pithora, Distt - Mahasamund C.G. 3 18 - Savitri D/o Khageshwar (Dead) Through Lr - Shri Jaikrishna S/o Kumar R/o Mohirapali, Tahsil - Saraipali, Distt - Mahasamund C.G. 19 - Pushpanjali D/o Loknath R/o Village - Devandabri, Tahsil Jharband, Distt - Bargarh Odisha 20 - Divyanjali D/o Loknath R/o Village - Bokramuda, Tahsil - Padampur, Distt - Bargarh Odisa 21 - Subalaya D/o Narayan R/o Village - Onaki, Tahsil - Jharband, Distt - Bargarh Odisa 22 - Kalyani D/o Late Narayan R/o Village - Balasi, Tahsil - Saraipali, Distt - Mahasamund C.G. 23 - Maithili D/o Late Narayan R/o Village - Kurma, P.O. Gaurmal, Tahsil - Jhanband, Distt - Bargarh Odisa 24 - Jayanti Kumar S/o Visambhar R/o Village - Palsapali, Tahsil Basna, Distt - Mahasamund C.G. 25 - Anil Kumar S/o Visambhar R/o Village - Palsapali, Tahsil Basna, Distt - Mahasamund C.G. 26 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Mahasamund, Distt - Mahasamund C.G. 27 - Sub Divisional OfÏcer (R) Saraipali, Distt - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 28 - Tahsildar Basna, Distt - Mahasamund C.G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) 4 For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Ritesh Giri, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 14.01.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent Additional Commissioner Raipur Division Raipur to decide the Appeal case no. 83-A/27/2021-22, Gandeshwar & Anr. vs. Shyam Kumar, which is pending since 2021. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the appeal has been preferred by the respondent no. 1 & 2 against the order dated 09.12.2021 passed by the SDO (Revenue) in Appeal Revenue Case No. 20196120500007 year 2019, which is still pending and the same has not been decided by the Commissioner. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that if the Second Appeal is still pending before the Commissioner, the same shall be decided within a stipulated period i.e. 45 days from today. 4. In view of the submission, made by the respondent, the writ petition is disposed off by directing the Commissioner to decide the appeal pending i.e. Second Appeal No. 83/2021-22 within a period of 45 days. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib