Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21908 (CHH)

NETRAM BANJARE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4641/2025 · 2025-06-15

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:24535 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4641 of 2025 1 - Netram Banjare S/o Nakul Ram Banjare Aged About 60 Years Posted And Working As Head Master At Govt. Middle School Dongariya (Khurd) Block Pandariya District - Kabirdham (C.G.) 2 - Sudhir Kumar Sharma S/o Dwarika Prasad Sharma Aged About 50 Years Posted And Working As Head Master At Govt. Middle School Rajkatta, Block Dongargarh District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 3 - Bharat Dev Singh Baghel S/o A.R. Baghel Aged About 44 Years Posted And Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Govt. H.S. School Limha Block Takhatpur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Poornanand Dhankar S/o Makhan Ram Dhankar Aged About 53 Years Posted And Working As Teacher (Lb) At Govt. Middle School Katangi Block Chhuikhadan District - Khairagarh - Chhuikhadan Gandai (C.G.) 5 - Piyush Chandra Nagendra S/o Kuber Singh Nagendra Aged About 42 Years Posted And Working As Head Master At Govt. Primary School Bendri Block Chhuikhadan District - Khairagarh - Chhuikhadan - Gandai C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Rajnandgaon District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Bilaspur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - District Education Officer Kabirdham District - Kabirdham (C.G.) 7 - District Education Officer Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai District - Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai (C.G.) 8 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Rajnandgaon District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 9 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Bilaspur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 10 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Kabirdham District - Kabirdham (C.G.) 11 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai District - Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai (C.G.) 12 - Block Education Officer Block Dongargarh District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 13 - Bock Eudcation Officer Block Takhatpur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 14 - Block Education Officer Block Pandariya District - Kabirdham (C.G.) 15 - Bock Education Officer Block Chhuikhadan District- Khairagarh Chhuikhadan Gandai (C.G.) 16 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Dongargarh District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 17 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Takhatpur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 18 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Chhuikhadan District - Khairagarh Chhuikhadan - Gandai (C.G.) 19 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Pandariya District - Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioners : Shri P. Chetan Kumar, Advocate. For State : Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 16.06. 202 5 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking direction towards the respondent/ authorities for grant of Kramonnati Vetanman on completion of 10 years of service in view of the order passed by Division Bench of this High Court in WA No. 261/2023 on 28.02.2024 and also as per circular dated 10.03.2017. issued by the State Government of C.G. 2. The claim of the petitioners are with regard to grant of Kramonnati Vetanman. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to award of Kramonnati Vetanman some circular has also been issued by the respondent- State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of Smt. Sona Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others in W.A. No. 261 of 2023 has also consider the identical issue. Petitioners are also entitle for Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 dated 28/02/2024. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents. 3 5. Against the order passed in WA No. 261 of 2023, the State preferred a review petition bearing REVP No. 147 of 2024, which was considered and rejected by a detailed order. There against the State filed an SLP before the Supreme Court bearing SLP (C) No. 58525 of 2024, which was dismissed by order dated 17.03.2025. 6. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners, this petition at this stage is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to competent authority annexing all relevant documents and judgment of this Court passed in W.A. No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in W.A. No.261 of 2023 within further period of 4 months from the date of receipt of such representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, it is for the competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 7. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder