Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21905 (GAU)

RUP KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WA/37/2025 · 2025-02-11

N Unni Krishnan Nair

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010268962024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/37/2025 RUP KUMAR DAS S/O LATE RUKHINI KANTA DAS, A RESIDENT OF SEWA SARANI, SHANTIPARA, RONGPUR, PO RONGPUR, DIST CACHAR, ASSAM 788009 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM REHABARI GUWAHATI 781008 3:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (SR) ASSAM SILCHAR DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788001 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CACHAR DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788001 5:THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (CRIME) CUM ENQUIRY OFFICER D.P NO. 05/2-23 DIST CACHAR Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 78800 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S D PURKAYASTHA, MR S CHOUDHURY,MS S.S.BORA Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/4006/2024 RUP KUMAR DAS S/O LATE RUKHINI KANTA DAS A RESIDENT OF SEWA SARANI SHANTIPARA RONGPUR PO RONGPUR DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788009 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM REHABARI GUWAHATI 781008 3:THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (SR) ASSAM SILCHAR DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788001 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CACHAR DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788001 Page No.# 3/3 5:THE ADDITIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (CRIME) CUM ENQUIRY OFFICER DIST CACHAR ASSAM 788001 ------------ Advocate for : MR. S D PURKAYASTHA Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 12.02.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) After arguing the matter for quite some time, Mr. S. D. Purkayastha, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, on instruction, submits that he wants to withdraw this writ appeal and seeks liberty for the appellant to file a review petition. Accordingly, the instant writ appeal stands dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty granted to the appellant, as prayed for. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant