APHC010309802002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 21274/2002 Between: 1. SAMKRG PISTONS(RINGS)WORKERS UNION, VARISAM VILLAGE & PST., PYDIBHEEMAVARAM MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM DT REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, GUNDA CHENGALA RAO, S/O. MOHAN RAO, 26 YEARS, VARISAM VILLAGE, PYDIBHEEMAVARAM MANDAL, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LABOUR EMPLOYMENT TECHNICAL & FACTORIES DEPT., STATE OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, A.P., HYDERABAD. 3. THE MANAGEMENT OF SAMKRG PISTONS RINGS LTD, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR (OPERATION), PLANT NO.2, VARISAM VILLAGE, PYDIBHEEMAVARAM MANDAL, SRIKAKUAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not referring the dispute for adjudiction to the Industrial Tribunal in pursuance of the factual (failure) report submitted by the conciliation officer cum Dy. Commissioner of Labour, Visakhapatnam, in RC.No. C1259/2001, dt. 24.11.2001 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the provisions of Sec.10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to refer the dispute to the Industrial Tribunal, Visakhaptnam for adjudiction without further delay and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 26609 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to refer the charter of demandes dt. 23.12.2000 submitted by the petitioner union, in pursuance of the failure report submitted by the conciliation officer cum Dy. Commissioner of Labour, Visakhapatnam, in RC.No. C1259/2001, dt. 24.11.2001 for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal Cum Labour Court, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY The Court made the following: ORDER: Smt.V.Santhi Sree, learned counsel representing Sri V.Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner/s submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 07th July, 2025 RKS