Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21903 (BOM)

PANDURANG TUKARAM THOKE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/8971/2021 · 2025-03-21

Shri Arun R Pedneker

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 WP8971.2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 8971 OF 2021 . Pandurang Tukaram Thoke, Age: 65 Years, Occu.: Agril., R/o.: Anjandoha, Tq. Dharur, Dist. Beed .. Petitioner VERSUS 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, Revenue & Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 2. The Collector, Collectorate, Beed 3. The Special Land Acquisition Officer No.1, Ambajogai, Tq. Ambajogai, Dist. Beed Now Merged in The Sub – Divisional Officer, Sub-Division Majalgaon, Tq. Majalgaon, Dist. Beed 4. The Executive Engineer, Majalgaon Irrigation Division, Parli Vadyanath, Tq. Parali Vaydyanath, Dist. Beed .. Respondents ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Dnyaneshwar A. Bide AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. A. V. Lavte Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. B. R. Survase ... CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, C.J. & ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 21st MARCH, 2025 2025:BHC-AUG:8517-DB 2 WP8971.2021 ORDER: [Per Arun R. Pedneker, J.] 1. Heard. 2. Although, the writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the State to initiate the land acquisition proceedings of the petitioner’s land taken over by the State, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the acquisition proceedings are concluded and that the file is sent to the Collector for allocation of the funds. 3. The learned AGP appearing for the State submits that they would conclude the process within a period of two (02) months and would disburse the amounts to the rightful claimants within the said period. 4. The statement made by the learned AGP is accepted. 5. In view of the statement made by the learned AGP appearing for the Respondent / State, the Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] marathe