IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CMP No.19756 of 2025 in Ex. Petition No.148 of 2025 Decided on 25th August 2025 Sarvjeet Singh …Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and others …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Shrutika, Advocate, vice Mr. Dheeraj Vashisht, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Ms. Shrutika, learned counsel the respondents apprises the Court that needful has been done and more so in the light of the order that was passed in the writ petition, in case, the petitioner has any surviving grievance, he may approach the Court afresh by way a writ petition. 2. Taking into consideration that the initial order passed in the writ petition was only a consideration, this Court is of the considered view that it would be in the interest of justice, in case, these proceedings are closed but with liberty to 2 the petitioner that in case he still has any surviving grievance, he may approach the Court afresh by way of a writ petition. Ordered accordingly. 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 25, 2025 (Vinod)