Page No.# 1/7 GAHC010268202023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/219/2023 STRUCK OFF AND 6 ORS. VIDE HONBLE COURTS ORDER DTD. 18/12/2024 PASSED IN RSA NO.219/2023. 2: SRI SATISH BARMAM S/O SRI JITEN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 3: SRI RAHUL BARMAN S/O SRI JITEN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 4: SRI HRIDOY BARMAN S/O SRI JITEN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 5: SRI KAMALESWAR BARMAN S/O SRI JITEN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 Page No.# 2/7 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 6: SMTI DIPALI BARMAN W/O SRI JITEN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 7: SMTI PADMABATI BARMAN W/O SRI SATISH BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSA VERSUS BHARATI BARMAN @ BHARATI MEDHI AND 4 ORS. W/O SRI ATUL CH. MEDHI D/O LATE KARINDRA BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1, SUPARIGURI, PS BIJNI, DIST CHIRANG, BTAD, ASSAM 2:ON THE DEATH OF SMTI DAMAYANTI BALA BARMAN HER LEGAL HEIR SRI SUSHIL MOHAN BARMAN S/O LATE THUKURA BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BECHEMARI PO CHAPRAKATA PS AND DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 3:SRI JOGODISH BARMAN S/O SUSHIL MOHAN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BECHEMARI PO CHAPRAKATA PS AND DIST BONGAIGAON Page No.# 3/7 ASSAM 4:SRI DEBEN KUMAR BARMAN S/O SUSHIL MOHAN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BECHEMARI PO CHAPRAKATA PS AND DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 5:SRI PABITRA KUMAR BARMAN S/O SUSHIL MOHAN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BECHEMARI PO CHAPRAKATA PS AND DIST BONGAIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B J MUKHERJEE, MS R SAHA Advocate for the Respondent : MR F U BARBHUIYA (R-1), MR H R A CHOUDHURY (R-1),MS S DAS (R-1) Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/3822/2023 JITEN BARMAN @ JITENDRA BARMAN AND 6 ORS. S/O LATE KARINDRA BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 2: SRI SATISH BARMAM S/O SRI JITEN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 3: SRI RAHUL BARMAN Page No.# 4/7 S/O SRI JITEN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 4: SRI HRIDOY BARMAN S/O SRI JITEN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 5: SRI KAMALESWAR BARMAN S/O SRI JITEN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 6: SMTI DIPALI BARMAN W/O SRI JITEN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 7: SMTI PADMABATI BARMAN W/O SRI SATISH BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM VERSUS BHARATI BARMAN @ BHARATI MEDHI AND 4 ORS. W/O SRI ATUL CH. MEDHI D/O LATE KARINDRA BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NO. 1 Page No.# 5/7 SUPARIGURI PS BIJNI DIST CHIRANG BTAD ASSAM 2:ON THE DEATH OF SMTI DAMAYANTI BALA BARMAN HER LEGAL HEIRS 2.1:SRI SUSHIL MOHAN BARMAN S/O LATE THUKURA BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BECHEMARI PO CHAPRAKATA PS AND DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 2.2:SRI JOGODISH BARMAN S/O SUSHIL MOHAN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BECHEMARI PO CHAPRAKATA PS AND DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 2.3:SRI DEBEN KUMAR BARMAN S/O SUSHIL MOHAN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BECHEMARI PO CHAPRAKATA PS AND DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 2.4:SRI PABITRA KUMAR BARMAN S/O SUSHIL MOHAN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BECHEMARI PO CHAPRAKATA PS AND DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM For the appellant (s) : Mr. B. J. Mukherjee, Advocate For the respondent (s) : Mr. F. U. Borbhuiyan, Advocate Page No.# 6/7 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 28.03.2025 Mr. B. J. Mukherjee, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that the name of the proforma respondent Nos.2(a) may be struck off as the said respondent had expired and the estate of the proforma respondent No.2(a) is represented by the proforma respondent Nos.2(b); 2(c) & 2 (d). Taking into account the said submission, the name of the Respondent No. 2(a) is struck off. 2. The learned counsel for the Appellants is directed to file a fresh Memo of Parties and the Registry shall on the basis of the said Memo of Parties and the present order make necessary correction to the cause title of the Appeal and update the same in the CIS. 3. It is further seen that vide an order dated 07.06.2024, the Coordinate Bench of this Court had admitted the instant Appeal by formulating a substantial question of law. However, the LCR(s) was not called for. It has been submitted by both the parties that the LCR(s) would be required. 4. Considering the above, the Registry is directed to requisition Page No.# 7/7 the LCR(s) and upon receipt of the LCR(s), list this matter for hearing in its usual course. 5. Liberty is given to both the parties to file appropriate application for early hearing after receipt of the LCR(s). JUDGE Comparing Assistant