Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21884 (ALL)

MALTI DEVI v. STATE UTTAR PRADESH,THROUGH ITS SECRETARY(HOME), U.P GOVT. AND 4 OTHERS

NA529/299/2025 · 2025-04-23

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:66860 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 299 of 2025 Applicant :- Malti Devi Opposite Party :- State Uttar Pradesh,Through Its Secretary(Home), U.P Govt. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Prajapati,Mahesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the protest petition (Old No.6 of 2021) (New No.156 of 2022) registered with case crime no.748 of 2019 under section 380 IPC, Police Station Bidhuna, District Auraiya pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate / Addl. Civil Judge (J.D.), Bidhuna, Auraiya expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Applicant before this Court is the informant in the aforesaid case. It appears from the perusal of the order-sheet that after investigation, a closure report was submitted by the I.O. of this case, against which protest petition was moved by the informant / applicant. It also reflects from the perusal of the order-sheet that the protest petition is pending since long for about 3 years but no order has been passed so far. 4. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to decide the protest petition moved by the informant within a period of one month from the date of receiving the certified copy of this order before it. 5. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 ss Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad