Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21882 (KAR)

SMT SIDDAMMA M v. SRI C SIDDEGOWDA @ PAPANNA

WP/10487/2025 · 2025-06-30

M Nagaprasanna

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22842 WP No. 10487 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 10487 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. SIDDAMMA M W/O K.K. JAYARAMA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT NO.1086, 6TH MAIN ROAD, 1ST STAGEM HEBBALA, MYSORE CITY. REPRESENTED BY HER P.A.HOLDER, SRI.H.S.ANANDA, S/O SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, WORKING AT BIDARAHOSAHALLY PANCHAUATHI LIBRARY, R/AT BIDARAHOSAHALLY VILLAGE, C.A.KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA - 5714 22. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.G. RAVISHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. C. SIDDEGOWDA @ PAPANNA, S/O LATE CHIKKANNA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SUNNADADODDI VILLAGE, C.A.KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, NOW RESIDING AT DEVARAHALLI ROAD, K.M.DODDI (BHARATHINAGARA), Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22842 WP No. 10487 of 2025 C.A.KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA - 571 422. 2. SMT. SHYLAJA, W/O C. SIDDEGOWDA @ PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, WORKING AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, YALADAHALLI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., BIDARAHOSAHALLY, C.A.KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA - 571 422. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAKASHA R., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12/02/2025 PASSED IN O.S.NO.200/2019 BY THE HONBLE COURT OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AT MADDUR, i.e, ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTIALLY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri. M.G. Ravisha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. Prakasha R., learned counsel appearing for the respondents and have perused the material on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22842 WP No. 10487 of 2025 2. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order dated 12.02.2025 in O.S.No.200/2019, by which, the application filed by the respondents under Order XVIII Rule 17 of the C.P.C., seeking recall of PW Nos.1 to 4 for further cross-examination is allowed. The order is passed on 12.02.2025 and a day's proceeding is already over. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by form of this application, the respondents are wanting to drag the proceedings further. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that he would complete the cross-examination on the next date of hearing i.e., on 23.07.2025. 5. Therefore, it is made clear that the concerned Court shall not grant any adjournment to the respondents to complete the cross-examination of P.W.Nos.1 to 4 on the said date. The cross-examination shall conclude on the said date - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22842 WP No. 10487 of 2025 and no further application would be permitted to the respondents to be filed for further cross-examination. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30 CT: BHK