MD IMRAN ALIAS IMROZ ALIAS MD IMRAN KHAN ALLIAS IMRAN KHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3395/2025 · 2026-02-11
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2188 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2188 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3395 of 2025
1. Md. Imran @ Imroz @ Md. Imran Khan @ Imran Khan, aged about 21 years, son of Md. Firoz Khan
2. M. Altamas @ Md Altmas @ Md. Altmas Khan, aged about 20 years, son of Md. Firoz Khan Both residents of village-Baliyand, P.O. Kadma, P.S. Katkamsandi (O.P. Pelawal), Hazaribag, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners
:Dr. Suvendu Jaipuriar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P.
04/ 11.02.2026: Learned counsel submits he has received vakalatnma after getting no objection certificate from the earlier counsel however, he has not been able to file the same in the office and in view of that the said vakalatnama may kindly be taken on record.
2. In view of such submission, the said vakalatnama is taken on record.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
4. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Lohsinghna P.S. Case No. 08 of 2025, registered under sections 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 304, 126(2), 351(2) and 3 (5) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that F.I.R has been registered against 10 to 15 unknown persons and three name persons including the petitioners. He next submits that there are general and omnibus allegation of assault against all the accused persons and one of the co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 4790 of 2025. He submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is
disclosed in para 29 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail.
6.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that injuries are found to be grievous in nature.
7.
Considering that F.I.R has been registered against 10 to 15 unknown persons and three name persons including the petitioners. There are general and omnibus allegation of assault against all the accused persons and one of the co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.A. From whose assault injury has been received, is not disclosed and petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 29 of the petition.
8. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribag, in connection with Lohsinghna P.S. Case No. 08 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023.
Dt.11.02.2026
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-