Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 218775 (MAD)

Esakki Raja v. The Branch Manager

WP(MD)/28922/2025 · 2025-10-29

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.28922 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA Writ Petition(MD)No.28922 of 2025 Esakki Raja ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, 4E, RC Market Street, Viravanallur, Tirunelveli. 2.The Lead District Manager, Lead Bank Office – IOB Tirunelveli. 3.S.Esakki Priya ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to release the jewels pledged for Jewel Loan Account No. 140032028002308 availed from the 1st Respondent bank within a time limit as stipulated by this court. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.28922 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.I.Romeo Roy Alfred For Respondents : Mr.N.Dlipkumar Standing Counsel for R1 and R2 ORDER The petitioner seeks issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to release the jewels pledged under Jewel Loan Account No. 140032028002308, availed from the first respondent bank, within a time limit to be stipulated by this Court. 2. According to the petitioner, his father had availed a Kisan Credit Card (KCC) crop loan under Account No.140032000000005 to the tune of Rs.90,000/-, and also availed an agricultural jewel loan under Account No. 140032028002308 by pledging jewels weighing about 46 grams on 09.11.2018 to the tune of Rs.81,000/- from the first respondent bank. The petitioner's father passed away on 28.04.2020 without repaying the said loans. The petitioner thereafter repaid the entire amount due under the jewel loan, along with interest, on 21.09.2020. Thereafter, he requested the respondent bank to return the pledged jewels in their possession. However, the respondent bank refused to return the same. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. 3. It is seen that, since there are other legal heirs, the respondent bank has refused to return the jewels. It is also informed that the petitioner has already filed a civil suit in respect of the same. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.28922 of 2025 4. In view of the above, this Court is of the view that the petitioner shall work out his remedy in the said suit. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. 29.10.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes skn To 1.The Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ula Veedhi, Race Course Road, Madurai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Karaikudi AWPS, Sivagangai District, In Crime No.7 of 2023 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.28922 of 2025 P.T.ASHA, J. skn Writ Petition(MD)No.28922 of 2025 29.10.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis