Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21877 (GAU)

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS v. M/S CONSULTING ENGINEER (NG) AND 4 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3912/2024 · 2025-01-21

Kaushik Goswami

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010208432024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Linked Case : I.A.(Civil)/3912/2024 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY ASSAM SECRETARIAT (CIVIL) DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2: THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY ASSAM SECRETARIAT (CIVIL) DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 3: THE SECRETARY CUM DIRECTOR OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT CHENIKUTHI GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN- 781003 4: THE TENDER EVALUATION COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. VERSUS M/S CONSULTING ENGINEER (NG) AND 4 ORS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM BEING REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER MS. PRIYANKA DAS AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT- HOUSE NO. 46A SIMANTA PATH P.O.- PILINGKATA BASISTHA CHARIALI GUWAHATI- 781029 Page No.# 2/3 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM. 2:PRIYANKA DAS WIFE OF SRI PRANAB DAS RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 46A BASISTHA CHARIALI DISTRICT- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM PIN- 781029 3:M/S FRIEND ENTERPRISE REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI BHASKARJYOTI BARUAH HAVING ITS OFFICE AT MORANKARI HANDIQUE GAON NAMTI DOLL SIVASAGAR DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR ASSAM 4:M/S MEDICOS AND ENGINEERING REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR. FOIZUDDIN AHMED HAVING ITS OFFICE AT HATIPOTI P.S.- GELAKI DISTRICT- SIVASAGAR ASSAM. 5:JAYANTA KHAUND PROPRIETOR K.B. ROAD WARD NO. 11 P.S.- NORTH LAKHIMPUR DISTRICT- NORTH LAKHIMPUR ASSAM ------------ For petitioner/appellant(s) : Mr. M. M. Kataky, Advocate For respondent(s) : Ms. A. Gayan, CGC Page No.# 3/3 – BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI 22.01.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ) This application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with the prayer to condone the delay of 37 days in filing the connected appeal. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the State has preferred an appeal (Filing No. 14592/2024) against the judgment and order dated 23.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No. 3526/2024, against which another appeal, being WA No. 254/2024 has already been filed by private parties. Since the learned counsel for the contesting respondents has not seriously opposed this application for condonation of delay, this Interlocutory Application is allowed and the delay of 37 days caused in filing the connected appeal (Filing No. 14592/2024) is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same on 17.02.2025 along with WA No. 354/2024. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant