RAMESH CHAND AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CWP/12288/2025 · 2025-07-29
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21874 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21874 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.12288 of 2025
Decided on: 29th July, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ramesh Chand and another
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and others
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have preferred representations dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure P-2 Colly.) to respondent No.2 for the redressal of their grievances raised in this writ petition.
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 Petitioners’ grievance is that the representations preferred by them for redressal of their grievances in light of settled legal position have not been adjudicated till date. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners would be content in case respondent No.2/competent authority is
directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representations in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.
4.
Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure P-2 Colly.) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners.
The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 29, 2025
Judge Mukesh