Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21873 (RAJ)

SHAKUNTALA KOLI D/O LATE SHRI HAJARI LAL KOLI v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH

CW/9398/2025 · 2025-07-01

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23991] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9398/2025 Shakuntala Koli D/o Late Shri Hajari Lal Koli, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Ward No. 7, Shahpura, Bhilwara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Director (Non-Gazetted) And Additional Director (Administrative), Department Of Panchayati Raj (Health) Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Parashar For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 01/07/2025 1. By means of filing instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, a challenge has been made to the final order dated 09.06.2025 passed by the Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur, dismissing the appeal an affirming the transfer order dated 15.01.2025 whereby as Nursing Officer, she has been transferred from Government Community Health Center, Jhajpur, District Bhilwara to Sub-District Hospital, Anta Baran vice one Smt. Anuradha Meena. 2. Firstly, petitioner has not impleaded Anuradha Meena as party neither before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur nor before this Court in the writ petition. Smt. Anuradha Meena is one of necessary party, who has been [2025:RJ-JP:23991] (2 of 2) [CW-9398/2025] transferred in place of petitioner at CHC, Jhajpur, District Bhilwara. Without hearing the affected person- Smt. Anuradha Meena, impugned order of transfer cannot be set aside. 3. Further, counsel for petitioner does not dispute that petitioner is posted at CHC, District Bhilwara since long and the Tribunal has already examined the case of petitioner on merits. 4. In view of above, this Court does not deem it just and proper to interfere with the impugned transfer order and the writ petition is hereby dismissed. 5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /14