1 NJS, J & TRR, J LAAS_410_2016 & batch APHC010742722015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT Nos: 410, 411,415, 418. 432, 433, 477 of 2016 and 227 of 2017 LAAS No.410 of 2016 Between: The Special Deputy Collector-cum-Land Acquisition Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...APPELLANT AND N.PPdda Dastagiri, S/o.Pulla Reddy, Aged 55 years, R/o.Mandaluru Village Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondent: 1. Mr.Balla Ravindranath 2. Smt.Savithri Devi f t V. 2 NJS, J & TR'R, J LAAS_410_2Q16 & batch The Court made the following Common Judgment: (PerHonbiesnjustic eNmaiajayasurya) Heard Mr.T.S.Rayalu, learned Government Pleader for Appeals. Also I heard Smt.Savithri Devi, learned counsel for the respondents / claimants, who appeared through online. Aggrieved by a Common Order dated L.A.O.P.Nos.519, 520, 521, 522, 523, 524, 525 and 526 of 2012 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, the State preferred the present batch of appeals. The respondents herein are the claimants in the said O.Ps. For the purpose of excavation of Major Distributory in Block No.21 of Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, the Special Deputy Collector / Land Acquisition Officer issued a Notification dated 20.07.2005 under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for acquisition of land of an extent of Ac,8.47 cents in the village limits of Mandalur Village, Rudravaram Mandal belonging to the respondents / claimants. The Land Acquisition Officer by conducting Award enquiry, classified the lands into two categories i.e., (i) dry lands, (ii) irrigated dry lands and fixed the market value @ Rs.?0,000/- and Rs.40,000/- per acre respectively. The respondents / claimants while receiving the compensation under protest, sought reference under Section 18 of the Act. 18.01.2016 in the 2. 3. Before the Reference Court, the, respondents claimed an amount of support of their case, examined 4. Rs.2,00,000/- per acre and in P.Ws.1 (claimant in O.P.No.525 of 2012) to P.W.3 and got marked Exs.AI- Certified Copy of the Sale Deed dated 16.06.2003 and Ex.A2-Rudravaram » NJS, J & TRR, J LAAS_410_2016 & batch t Mandal Map issued by Special Deputy Collector (L.A.), S.R.B.C., Nandyal. On behalf of the Referring Officer, no oral evidence was adduced. Attested Copy of the Award No.101/2005 dated 24.03.2006 in respect of the lands in I question was marked as Ex.B1. 5. The Reference Court, on an appreciation of the oral and documentary evidence, enhanced the compensation in respect of subject lands to Rs.96,000/-. 6. Mr.T.S.Rayalu, the learned Government Pleader, vehemently contends that the enhancement of the compensation by the Reference Court is without r any valid basis. He submits that the respondents / claimants have not adduced any cogent evidence to substantiate their claim for enhancement of the compensation. He argues that Ex.A1-Sale transaction dated 16.06.2003 •.f is in respect of the lands situated in altogether a different village i.e., Chinna ^ Kambaluru, and even according to the respondents / claimants, the distance between the said village and the subject matter lands under acquisition situated in Mandalur Village is about 10 Kms. Therefore, the said sale transaction ought not to have been taken into consideration and the value fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer by taking the sale statistics at the time of f Award enquiry ought not to have been interfered with by the Reference Court. Making^ the said submissions, the learned counsel urges for allowing the appeals. 7. On the other hand, Smt.Savithri Devi, learned counsel for the ^ respondents / claimants appearing through on line made submissions to i 4 NiS, J & TRR, J ■ LAAS_410_2016 & batch sustain th© ordGr of th© R©f©r©nc© Court. Sh© cont©nds that th©- R©f©r©nc© I Court consid©r©d both oral and docum©ntary ©vid©nc© in th© prop©r p©rsp©ctiv© and in th© light of th© s©ttl©d l©gal position r©f©rr©d to in th© ord©r und©r challeng©, no int©rf6rence is call©d for by this Court in th© pres©nt app©als. 8. This Court has consid©r©d th© submissions mad© and th© point that aris©s for consid©ration is ; Wh©th©r th© fixation of mark©t valu© by th© R©f©r©nc© Court vide Common Ord©r und©r challong© warrants int©rfer©nc© by this Court as th© sam© is ©xc©ssiv©? 9. At the outset, it may b© appropriate to mention that hundreds of acres of land situated in different villages of Kurnool District were acquired for th© purpose of th© Telugu Ganga Project. Most of these villages are contiguous and nature of th© land in most of these villages is similar. Be that as it may. 10. As noted earlier, seeking enhancement of the compensation in respect of the subject matter lands, the claimants got examined P.W.1 (claimant in L.A.O.P.No.525 of 2012) and P.Ws.2 and 3. They relied on Ex.AI dated 16.06.2003 which is in respect of land situated at Chinna Kambaluru Village, wherein an extent of Ac.0.50 cents was sold for Rs.40,000/- which works out to Rs.80,000/- per acre. In the claim statement before the Reference Court, the respondents / claimants stated that the fixation of market value is too low, that the Land Acquisition Officer was not correct in making the classification of lands and that it is proper to fix the market value @ Rs.2,00,000/- per acre. P.W.1 filed affidavit in lieu of chief examination asserting the contents of the 5 NJS, J & TRR, J LAAS_410_2016 & batch claim statement. P.W.3, one of the attestors to the Sale Deed dated 16.06.2003(Ex.A1) supported the version of P.W.I. Most importantly, P.W.2 the Mandal Agricultural Officer whose jurisdiction extends to Mandalur Village, wherein the subject lands and Chinna Kambaluru village wherein Ex.A1 land are situated, categorically deposed that the said lands are having similar crop pattern, productivity and the market value. Nothing contra was elicited in the cross examination of P.Ws.1 to 3. It is also brought on record that the said villages are situated within a distance of 10 Kms., radius. However, no contra evidence was adduced either oral or documentary on behalf of the Referring Officer, in the absence of which, the compensation has to be fixed on the basis of the evidence adduced by the claimants. At this juncture, the contention raised by the learned Government Pleader with regard to the sales statistics relied on by the Land Acquisition Officer may also be referred to. However, it is settled law that unless the sale transactions forming basis for fixation of compensation by the Land Acquisition Officer are exhibited, the same cannot be treated as evidence though a reference was made in the Award [See: Chimanlal Hargovinddas 11. v. SpLLand Acquisition Officer, Poona (1988 (3) SCO 751)]. Therefore mere marking of Ex.B1-Award in the absence of oral and documentary evidence supporting the fixation of market value by the Land Acquisition Officer would not enure to the benefit of the State. Be that as it may. 4 fT' •: 6 NJS, J &' TRR, J ■ LAAS_410_2016 & batch In the land acquisition matters, the Law is well settled that the Court is required to fix the just and reasonable compensation. In the present case, to substantiate their claim for enhancement, the respondents / claimants placed reliance on Ex.A1-Registered Sale Deed dated 16.06.2003. The sale transaction is in respect of an extent of Ac.0.50 cents ( 72 acre) for Rs.40,000/- which took place more than 2 years prior to the issuance of Section 4 (1) Notification dated 20.07.2005 in respect of the subject matter lands. In the absence of any contra material on record adduced by the Referring Officer, the Court has no option except to take the said Sale Deed into consideration, by taking the time gap of 2 years. In Omprakash and Ors., v. Union of lndia\ the Hon ble Supreme Court opined that 12% value appreciation per annum, in the attending facts and circumstances can be taken into consideration. Therefore, by taking the time gap of 2 years and the value appreciation @ 12% p.a., the market value of the subject matter lands on the basis of Ex.AI would come to Rs.1,00,352/-, which is more than the market value fixed by the Reference Court @ Rs.96,000/- per acre. Though the subject matter lands are categorized into dry lands and irrigated dry lands under bore well, going by the J evidence on record, more particularly P.W.2-Agricultural Officer and the potentiality of the acquired lands which are suitable for both commercial and food crops by virtue of Telugu Ganga Project / Distributory canals, fixation of 12. 13. 14. ^ AIR 2004 SC 4135 1 7 NJS, J & TRR, J <%7 LAAS_410_2016& batch compensation uniformly @ Rs.96,000/- per acre, in the considered opinion of this Court is just and reasonable. Accordingly, the point is answered. Having considered the matter in its entirety, there are no grounds to interfere with the well reasoned order of the learned Reference Court. In the aforesaid view of the matter, the appeals fail and the same are accordingly dismissed. No costs. Applications pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. 15. 16. Consequently, the Miscellaneous Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOIN^EGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. ^Two CCs to GP for Appeals, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri Balia Ravindranath & M/s. K. Savithri Devi, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 5. Two CD Copies SRm sree , 1 HIGH COURT DATED : 10/07/2025 COMMON JUDGMENT + DECREE LAAS NO. 410, 411, 415, 418, 432, 433, 477 OF 2016 and 227 of 2017 AMOH^ 0 9 SEP 2025 0\v //ac m *9 DISMISSING THE LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUITS WITHOUT COSTS ZZ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NOS: 410. 411, 415. 418. 432, 433, 477 OF 2016 and 227 of 2017 L.A.A.S. No. 410 of 2016 APHC010121992016 Appeal filed against the order and decree dt. 18-01-2016 in LAOP.No.523 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector -Cum- Land Acquisition Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District ...Appellant/Respondent AND N. Pedda Dastagiri, S/o. Pulla Reddy, Age 55 years, R/o. Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent / Claimant lA NO: 2 OF 2016 (LAASMP 1181 OF 2016 . : P^lrtion under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in ttiejaffidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to i. Stay of ell further proceedings pursuant to decree and order passed in OP No.523/2012 dated 18.01.016 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. LAAS NO: 411 OF 2016 APHC010233982016 Appeal against the order and decree dt. 18-01-2016 in LAOP.NO. 525 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool Dist. Between: Special Deputy Collector -Cum-Land Acquisition Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND C. Jakaraiah, S/o. SOman, age 60 years, R/o. Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 2 OF 2016fLAA$MP 1182 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings pursuant to decree and order passed in OP No.525/2012 dated 18.01.016 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District LAAS NO: 415 OF 2016 APHC010473152016 I. Appeal against the order and decree dt.18-01-2016 in LAOP.No.520 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda. Between: Special Deputy Collector -cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District ...Appellant/Petitioner AND N. Linga Reddy, S/o.Chinna Linga Reddy, Age 70 years, R/o.Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 2 OF 2016(LAASMP 1189 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings pursuant to decree and order passed in OP No.520/2012 dated 18.01.016 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. •v LAAS NO: 418 OF 2016 APHC010122112016 BS Appeal against the order and decree dt.18.01.2016 in LAOP N0.522 of 2012 and batch on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: The Special Deputy Collector-Cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/ Petitioner AND M. Suvarthaiah, S/o. Samuel, Age 45 years, R/o. Mandaluru Village Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant lA NO: 2 OF 2016 (LAASMP 1192 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings pursuant to decree and order passed in LAOP No.522/2012 dated 18.01.2016 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. LAAS NO: 432 OF 2016 APHC010121912016 QMS Appeal against the order and decree dt.18-01-2016 in LAOP.No.519 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector -Cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District ...Appellant / Petitioner AND N.O. Rama Linga Reddy, S/o. Linga Reddy, Age 25 years, R/o. Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/ Claimant lA NO: 2 OF 2016 (LAASMP 1211 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings pursuant to decree and order passed in LAOP No.519/2012 dated 18.01.2016 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. LAAS NO: 433 OF 2016 APHC010565032016 Appeal against the order and decree dt; 18-01-2016 in LAOP.No. 524 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector -Cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant / Petitioner AND A. Adi Laxmamma, W/o. Venkata Setty, age 45, R/o. Mandaluru Village Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent / Claimant lA NO: 2 OF 2016(LAASMP 1220 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings pursuant to decree and order passed in LAOP No.524/2012 dated 18.01.2016 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District LAAS NO: 477 OF 2016 APHC010712042016 ■ Appeal against the order and decree dt. 18-01-2016 in LAOP.NO. 521 of 2012 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector -Cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant / Petitioner AND N. Naga Laxmamma, W/o. Maddileti Reddy, Age 50 years, R/o. Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/ Claimant lA NO: 2 OF 2016 (LAASMP 1307 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings in OP No.521/2012 dated 18.01.2016 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District LAAS NO: 227 OF 2017 APHC010307932017 Appeal against the order and decree dt. 18-01-2016 in LAOP.No.526 of 2012 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Between: Special Deputy Collector -Cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District ...Appellant / Petitioner AND A. Subbamma, W/o. Pulla Reddy, Age 70 years, R/o.Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent / Claimant lA NO: 1 OF 2017 (LAASMP 363 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings pursuant of decree and order passed in OP No.526/2012 dated 18.01.2016 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District Counsel for the Petitioners in above appeal: GP FOR APPEALS (AP) Counsel for the Respondents in above appeal: BALLA RAVINDRANATH & M/S. K.SAVITHRI DEVI The Court made the following COMMON JUDGMENT: t ' » IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 227 of 2017 APHC010307932017 Between; Special Deputy Collector -Cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant / Petitioner AND A. Subbamma, W/o Pulla Reddy, Age 70 years, R/o Mandaluru Village Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal against the order and decree dt. 18.01.2016 in LAOP N0.526 of 2012 and batch on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in < t the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. 2. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Two CD Copies 2. SRm sree HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 * DECREE LAASNO. 227 OF 2017 1 DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 477 of 2016 APHC010712042016 Between: Special Deputy Collector -Cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant / Petitioner AND N. Naga Laxmamma, W/o Maddileti Reddy, Aged 50 years, R/o Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal against the order and decree dt.18.01.2016 in LAOP N0.521 of 2012 and batch on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SRm sree < I V, HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 \ 4 DECREE LAAS NO. 477 OF 2016 DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 433 of 2016 APHC010565032016 Between: Special Deputy Collector -Cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant I Petitioner AND A. Adi Laxmamma, W/o. Venkata Setty, age 45, R/o. Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal against the order and decree dt.18.01.2016'in LAOP N0.524 of 2012 and batch on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SRm sree 4 k HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE LAAS NO. 433 OF 2016 DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 432 of 201fi APHC010121912016 Between: Special Deputy Collector -Cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District ...Appellant/ Petitioner AND N.O. Rama Linga Reddy, S/o. Linga Reddy, Age 25 years, R/o. Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal against the order and decree dt.18.01.2016 in LAOP N0.519 of 2012 and batch on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and Appellant. upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there shail be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SRm sree « HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 k decree LAAS NO. 432 OF 2016 ♦ DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 418 of 2016 APHC010122112016 \sl'W V: 02!> Between: . The Special Deputy Collector-Cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant / Petitioner AND M. Suvarthaiah, S/o. Samuel, Age 45 years, R/o. Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent^Claimant Appeal against the order and decree dt.18.01.2016 in LAOP N0.522 of 2012 and batch on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SRm sree HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE LAAS NO. 418 OF 2016 DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 415 of 2016 APHC010473152016 Between: Special Deputy Collector -cum- Land Acquisition, Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District ...Appellant/Petitioner AND N. Linga Reddy, S/o.Chinna Linga Reddy, Age 70 years, R/o.Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. , ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed against the order and decree dt. 18-01-2016 in LAOP.No.520 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Two CD Copies 2. SRm sree ■% HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE LAAS NO. 415 OF 2016 DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 411 of 2016 APHC010233982016 Between: Special Deputy Collector -Cum-Land Acquisition Telugu Ganga Project Nandyal, Kurnool District. ...Appellant/Petitioner AND C. Jakaraiah, S/o. Soman, age 60 years, R/o. Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant Appeal filed against the order and decree dt. 18-01-2016 in LAOP.No.525 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant. ■ THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. 2. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// T SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Two CD Copies 2. SRm sree HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE LAAS NO. 411 OF 2016 DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 410 of 2016 APHC010121992016 Between: Special Deputy Collector -Cum- Land Acquisition Telugu Ganga Project, Nandyal, Kurnool District ...Appellant/Respondent AND N. Pedda Dastagiri, S/o. Pulla Reddy, Age 55 years, R/o. Mandaluru Village, Rudravaram Mandal, Kurnool District. ...Respondent/Claimant 18-01-2016 in LAOP.No.523 of 2012 and batch on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. Appeal filed against the order and decree dt. This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Order and Decree of the Lower Court, and material papers in the petition and upon hearing arguments of GP for Appeals for the Appellant. THIS COURT DOTH ORDER AND DECREE: 1. That the Land Acquisition Appeal suit be and is hereby dismissed. 2. That there shall be no order as to costs in this Land Acquisition Appeal suit. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, Kurnool District. 2. Two CD Copies SRm sree I HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 DECREE LAASNO. 41 OOF 2016 * $ 0 9 SEP 2025 S ^S£espATC^3^^ OM .1 DISMISSING THE LAAS WITHOUT COSTS k