1 2025:CGHC:41315 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 576 of 2024 Dhanush Yadav S/o Dhwajaram Yadav Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Bijabhath, Tahsil And District Bemetara (C.G.) .. Applicant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Vandana Yadav W/o Dhanush Yadav Aged About 25 Years R/o Sharda Para, Bharav Basti Camp No. 2, Police Station Chhawni, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) 2 - Ku. Sheeetal Yadav D/o Dhanush Yadav Aged About 2.5 Years, D/o Dhanush Yadav, Minor Represented Through Mother Smt. Vandana Yadav, S/o Sharda Para, Bharav Basti Camp No. 2, Police Station Chhawni, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) 3 - Ku. Kajal D/o Dhanush Yadav Aged About 2 Years Minor Represented Through Mother Smt. Vandana Yadav, S/o Sharda Para, Bharav Basti Camp No. 2, Police Station Chhawni, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Vidya Bhushan Soni, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by AKHILESH KUMAR DEWANGAN 2 14 /08/2025 1. Heard Mr. Vidya Bhushan Soni, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The present criminal revision has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 19.09.2022 passed by the learned Second Additional Principal Judge, Family Court Durg, District – Durg (C.G.) in Misc. Criminal Case No.1071/2017, whereby, the Family Court partly allowed the application under Section 125 of CrPC filed by the respondents and directed the applicant to pay Rs.1,500/- per month to respondent No.2 and Rs.1,500/- per month to respondent No.3, towards maintenance. 3. The present criminal revision is barred by 528 days of its limitation as has been reported by the Registry. 4. From perusal of application for condonation of delay, it is apparent that the applicant has not given day to day explanation for inordinate delay of 528 days in filing the revision, as such, the revision is barred by delay and laches and is not liable to be entertained. 5. Considering the grounds raised in I.A. No. 02 of 2024, I do not find any good ground to condone the delay of 528 days in preferring the revision. 6. Accordingly, I.A. No. 02 of 2024 is rejected and consequently thereto, the revision is also dismissed. 3 7. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to transmit the certified copy of this order alongwith original record to the concerned trial Court within a week from today for necessary information and follow up action. Sd/- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Akhil