Ponnukanti Manjula, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/14358/2019 · 2025-10-16
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21852 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21852 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010308712019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 14358/2019
Between:
1. PONNUKANTI MANJULA,, D/O PREMA CHARY AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, VRS, R/O. FLAT NO..201, EAST VILLA, NAVODAYA ENCLAVE, YELLAREDDY GUDA HYDERABAD.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARUNDALPETA, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.14358 OF 2019
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“….to writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the delay and inaction on the part of the respondents in registering the FIR based on complaint made by the petitioner on 20-08-2019 regarding theft of bank cheques and blank stamp papers, and life threat at the hands of anti-social elements which disclose the commission of cognizable offence as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to register the FIR in terms of Sec.154 Cr.P.C. based on the complaint made by the petitioner on 20-08- 2019 and to pass…”
2.
Learned counsel representing Sri Nagaraju Pullagura, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.
4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 17.10.2025 Pmk
3
36 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No:14358 OF 2019
Date: 17.10.2025
Pmk
4