Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2185 (BOM)

SHASHIKANT SITARAM KAMBLE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

APEAL/840/2025 · 2026-02-17

Vrushali V Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15-APEAL-840-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.840 OF 2025 Shashikant Sitaram Kamble …..Appellant Vs. The State Of Maharashtra & Ors …..Respondents None for the Appellant. Mr. Prashant Bandgar, for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr. Shrikant H. Yadav, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. R. R. Gosavi, Kavthemahakal, Police Station. CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J. DATED : 17th FEBRUARY 2026 P.C.:- 1. The Appellant has filed the present Appeal seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail allegedly granted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli. The learned APP has brought to the notice of this Court that no crime has been registered in the present case. Without registration of any crime, the question of granting anticipatory bail does not arise. The learned APP, on instructions, has further submitted that though a complaint was filed, the dispute has been settled between the parties. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent is present Suresh 1/2 15-APEAL-840-2025.doc and has also submitted that an agreement has taken place between the parties and that no FIR has been registered. In these circumstances, the present Application has no merit. Hence, the Application stands dismissed. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) Suresh 2/2