RAHUL KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS RAHUL KUMAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7424/2025 · 2025-08-28
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21844 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21844 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:25923 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 7424 of 2025
-------
Rahul Kumar Gupta @ Rahul Kumar, aged about 19 years, son of Dilip Gupta @ Dilip Saw @ Dilip Sao, resident of village Giddi, P.O. & P.S. Giddi, District Hazaribag.
…... …. Petitioner(s)
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.…. …. Opp. Party
-------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
-------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Binod Kr. Dubey, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P. P.
--------
02/ Dated 28.08.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Giddi ‘C’ P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025, corresponding to Special POCSO Case No.59 of 2025, for the offence registered under Sections 137(2), 87 & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and cognizance taken under Sections 137(2), 87 & 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, pending in the court of Sri Asif Equbal, learned Additional District Judge-III-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act, Hazaribag.
Petitioner is alleged to have enticed the daughter of the informant with an intention to marry her.
Statement of the victim was recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS, in which, she has stated that she has left her lawful guardianship according to her own wish. She has also stated that petitioner had forcibly established physical relationship with her.
The age of the victim is assessed to be 16 years old.
Considering the fact that petitioner forcibly established physical relationship with a minor girl, I am not inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected at this stage.
(Ambuj Nath, J.) BS/-