Bimla Devi versus Satish Sharma Cr. Appeal No. of 2025 22.09.2025 Present: Mr. Sumeet Raj Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. None for the respondent. Cr. MP (M) No. 1852 of 2025 On the last date of hearing, Mr. Devender Kumar, Advocate has put appearance on behalf of the respondent, by filing memo of appearance and the matter has been adjourned enabling the learned counsel for the respondent to file power of attorney, as well as reply, on behalf of the respondent. Neither power of attorney, nor reply filed. In such situation, further adjournment for this purpose is not justifiable. Applicant-Bimla Devi has sought indulgence of this Court to condone the delay of 27 days in filing the accompanying application, seeking leave to appeal, as well as the appeal. In view of the averments made in the application, which remain uncontroverted, the delay in filing the application, seeking leave to appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Cr.MPST No.5225/25 By way of the present application, the applicant, who is complainant, in this case, has sought the indulgence of this Court to grant leave to appeal. In view of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Criminal Appeal Nos.1868-1870 of 2025, titled as Celestium Financial versus A. Gnanasekaran & Others, there is no legal requirement, for the applicant, to seek special leave to appeal. As such, the application is disposed of accordingly. Cr. Appeal No. of 2025 Be registered. Let notice be issued to the respondent, returnable for 10th November, 2025, on taking steps within a period of seven days. (Virender Singh) Judge September 22, 2025 (ps)