Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16122 WP No. 9293 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 9293 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
MRS GIRIJA POOJARTHI, W/O MR. B. ACHUTHA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
2.
MRS AMMANNI POOJARTI W/O MR. RAGHAVA KOTYAN AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT MATAPADI VILLAGE, BRAMHAVARA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT -576213. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI R SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, 5TH FLOOR, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER UDUPI DISTRICT, A BLOCK RAJATADRI MANIPAL, UDUPI – 576104.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR, BRAMHAVARA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576104.
4.
THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, 26TH HANDADI GRAMA PANCHAYAT,
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16122 WP No. 9293 of 2025
BRAMHAVARA, UDUPI DISTRICT-576104. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI V SHIVA REDDY, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3, TO DISCHARGE THEIR STATUTORY OBLIGATIONS U/S 103 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964, THE CIRCULAR INSTRUCTIONS DTD 20/10/2023 (ANNEXURE-Y) AND TO REMOVE THE ABSTRACTIONS CAUSED TO THE AGRICULTURAL LANDS OF THE PETITIONERS BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATIONS DTD 25/02/2025 AS PER ANNEXURE- X AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous, since the claim of the petitioners has been addressed by the Authorities.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16122 WP No. 9293 of 2025
2. Memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners to that effect.
3. In the light of the Memo filed by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become unnecessary.
4. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.
SD/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE
HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40