M PRASANTH v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thirupparamkundram
CRL OP(MD)/22638/2025 · 2025-12-10
S Srimathy
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 218368 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 218368 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD). No.22638 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10/12/2025 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD). No.22638 of 2025
1. M Prasanth
2. K.Suriya ... Petitioners / A1 & A5 Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Thirupparamkundram, Police Station, Madurai District. Crime No.604 of 2025. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vishnu Kanth, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-33AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.604 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.22638 of 2025 The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2)(3), 132, 121(1), 324(3)(5), 352(3), 196(2), 351(2) of BNS, and Section 4 of the TNPHW Act and Section 3 of the TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.604 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant/VAO lodged a complaint that the petitioners and other accused persons were allegely farmed a group and gathered at the hill path during the time of lighting the Moksha Deepam at the Pillaiyar temple situated on the Thirupparankundram Hill and inspite of intimation given by the police personnel, they failed to disperse and forcibly threw iron barricades at the police personnel and caused injuries to them and also caused damage to the public property worth about Rs.1 lakh. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.22638 of 2025 and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that as of now the petitioners are not accused in the present case.
5. Recording the above said submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. However,in case if the petitioners' names are added in future, they are at liberty to approach this Court.
10.12.2025 PJL TO
1. The Judicial Magistrate No.VI, Madurai.
2. Do-Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai District. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.22638 of 2025
3. The Inspector of Police, Thirupparamkundram, Police Station, Madurai District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.22638 of 2025 S.SRIMATHY,J
PJL
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.22638 of 2025 Date : 10/12/2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis