APHC010308632014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 1779/2014 Between: 1. INTURU MUKHESH,, S/O. INTURU BULLI APPARAO AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.TAMARAKOLLU VILLAGE KAIKALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, MARKETING DIVISION, A.P.STATE OFFICE 3-6-436, 2ND FLOOR, NASPUR HOUSE HIMAYATNAGAR, HYDERABAD. 2. CHIEF DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED DIVISIONAL OFFICE, GVR TOWERS, 3RD FLOOR, BHARATI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-520008 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SAI SANJAY SURANENI 2. R V NAGABUSHNAM RAO 3. DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Vedula Chitralekha, learned Counsel representing Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri D. Prudhvi Teja, learned Counsel representing Sri Sai Sanjay Suraneni, learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2. 2. Sri D. Prudhvi Teja, learned Counsel representing Sri Sai Sanjay Suraneni, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Divisional Retail Sales Head, Vijayawada Divisional Office, dated 17.07.2025. Copy of it is not supplied to the Counsel appearing on behalf of the Writ Petitioner, as he is appearing online. The same are taken on record. 3. The relevant portion of the Written Instructions is usefully extracted hereunder: "It may be noted that the stoppage was based solely on the legal notice issued by the landowner, and there was no termination of dealership. Further, the dealership continues to exist, and supply has been resumed. As per latest update, the RO is fully operational, and the issues between the parties have been settled amicably pursuant to order dated 15.11.2019." 4. The above extract would indicate that the dealership of the Writ Petitioner continues to exist and supply has been resumed. 5. Having noted the same, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition, as no further consideration is necessary. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 18.07.2025 DSV 166 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.1779 of 2014 18.07.2025 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No.W.P.No.1779 of 2014 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 3. 18.07.2025 GRKP, J Writ Petition is disposed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV