APHC010307312018 </ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) KB P'7 B Oil y o "O THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13965 OF 2018 A •v 4- r Between: Manam Nageswar Reddy, S/o Perasuba Reddy, Age 35Years Employee, R/o D.Neratur Village, B.Mattam Mandal YSR Kadapa Dist Occ ...Petitioner ' AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal, Secretary, Home Department,Secretariat, 2. Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. 3. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa 4. The Station House Officer, B.Mattam Mandal, Mydukur,(Rural) 5. Ranga Swamy, Sub-Inspector of Police, B.Mattam Mandal, Y.S.R. District. 6. Manyam Siva Reddy, S/o Manyam Shankar Reddy Aged about 50 years R/o D.Nelturu Village, B.Mattam Mandalam, Kadapa District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the No.3, who proceeded with the enquiry without registering any FIR against the may be respondent V respondent No.5 and thereby submitting the incomplete C.N0.O2/CI/DCRB-KDP/2OI6 dated 20.04.2017 to the Hon’ble High Court i W.P.N0.34493 of 2016 misleading the Hon’ble Court from report in in passing appropriate orders in favour of the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the settled principles of law and violative of principles of natural justice and set aside the said memo and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to forthwith register the FIR against the respondent No.5 in dealing with life of the petitioner and victimizing the petitioners family and award compensation to the since the respondent No.5 violated the petitioners fundamental petitioner rights coercively as he had taken law into his own hands lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent No.3 to register the FIR against the respondent disobeying law with an intention to cause injury to the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition \A NO: 1 OF 2024 No.5 in Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the atfidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to permit the Petitioner to file additional material paper relating to the report dated 29.04.2023 submitted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, to the 3rd Respondent in W.P.No. 1,3964/2018 in the interest of justice Kadapa Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME (AP) Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI V R REDDY KOWURI The Court made the following order: / / APHC010307312018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] P PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13965/2018 Between: 1.MANAM NAGESWAR REDDY,, S/0 PERASUBA REDDY, AGE 35YEARS,OCC EMPLOYEE VILLAGE, B.MATTAMMANDAL YSR KADAPADIST R/0 D.NERATUR ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL. SECRETARY HOME DFPARTMENT ,SECRETARIAT, 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, B.MATTARN MANDAL, MYDUKUR,(RURAL) 5.RANGA SWAMY, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, B.MATTAMMANDAL, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 6.MANYAM SIVA REDDY, S/0 MANYAM SHANKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/0 D.NELTURU VILLAGE, B.MATTAMMANDALAM, KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3, who proceeded with the enquiry without registering any FIR against the respondent No.5 and thereby submitting the incomplete report in 2 C.NO.02/C1/DCRB-KDP/2016 dated 20.04.2017 to the Honble High Court in W.P.No.34493 of 2016 misleading the Honble Court from passing appropriate orders in favour of the petitioner, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the settled principles of law and violative of principles of natural justice and set aside the said memo and consequently direct the respondent No.3 to forthwith register the FIR against the respondent No.5 in dealing with life of the petitioner and victimizing the petitioners family and award compensation to the petitioner since the respondent No.5 violated the petitioners fundamental rights coercively as he had taken law into his own hands and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent No.3 to register the FIR against the respondent No.5 in disobeying law with an intention to cause injury to the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to file additional material paper relating to the report dated 12-01- 2017 submitted by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kadapa to the 3rd Respondent in W.P.No. 13964/2018 in the interest of justice ifi support of the lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the Counter affidavit copies on record by allowing the leave petition in the writ petition in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME (AP) 2.VR REDDY KOWURI r 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13965 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Heard Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent No.5. and learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. / The facts and circumstances submitted by learned counsel on both sides would discloses that the petitioner submitted a representation to respondent No.3-Superintendent of Police on 27.10.2016, but the respondent No.3 did not dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner. 2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered opinion that without going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition may be disposed of, at the stage of admission itself, directing respondent No.3 to dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 27.10.2016, within a period of four (04) weeks, by duly considering the representation of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, in accordance with law. 3. '-•5^ 4 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. \ Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1, The Principal Secretary. State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada. 2. Director 3. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa House Officer, B.Mattarn Mandal, Mydukur,(Rural) 4. The Station 5. One CC to 6. TwoCCsto 7. OneCCto 8. Two CD Copies SR! P NAGENDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] GP FOR HOME (AP) High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] SRI V R REDDY KOWURI Advocate [OPUC] gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 11/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 13965 OF 2018 % 23 SEP 2025 ( X- mi <.D Co :v ^ Current section ■'■' DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS