SRI MANTU DAS @ MANTU KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
AB/3311/2024 · 2025-03-26
Susmita Phukan Khaund
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21830 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21830 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010267292024
2025:GAU-AS:3597
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3311/2024 SRI MANTU DAS @ MANTU KUMAR DAS S/O HIRANYA DAS R/O VILL- BAHARI, P.O. NIZ BAHARI, P.S. TARABARI, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S J SARMAH, MR. P BOIRAGI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 27.03.2025
1. Heard learned counsel Ms. S. J. Sarmah for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. D. P. Goswami for the respondent State.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he has been involved in
Page No.# 2/2 conspiracy of receiving an ordered copy of the judgment of Misc Application No. 66/2020 dated 18.08.2021 and the date of order was 21.08.2021. The informant was on leave during this period and the petitioner is suspected of having received the copy in the petitioner’s absence.
3. The petitioner has been granted interim bail vide order dated 17.12.2024, by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
4. I have scrutinized the Case Diary. The petitioner has appeared before the I.O. and he has co-operated with the investigation. The petitioner has not violated any bail conditions.
5. Interim order dated 17.12.2024 is hereby made absolute.
6. Send back the Case Diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant