Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2183 (PNJ)

VIKRAM SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/63670/2025 · 2026-01-29

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-63670-2025 -1-                                !"#$%$ &'()&*+,-                            '  ./ 01 00                !"       #          $!  % &      '''     0 -2 /3'    (         &     )*+    , % -      +.+/    0,-1" %        %&  23- 45* ./ .6 +.+7       /.6 )" 54 +" 4+8 +" /.) 447 +" 464 /"46. /4. +", %-%% +.+/  0,-1"  /4. +",-&     - +* .8 4. +.+7   /.6 +",-$"   +7   4676 &  !%  9   +   (   23$       %   &   :   ; :   ./ .6 +.+7 &&       %+.+/   & $      % $ & %$%   &&  (  & PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.01.30 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-63670-2025 -2-   %   &   % $         <     &= &%      &  >     &  " < &&      ./ .6 +.+7   &  $              $    # &      $   <  ; ,&$ $ = $        $& &  &      & $  % <     &    %  2    &   & $      < $    & 9  -    $    %  &  $       ?            $   &   $  ( %     &          (   &       &&    &     &&      &   $ &>          & @ !?      %  $ $$     &  & $      %  &    (    %    %      & $%       23                  $%                &         %&$    % !&   &  A   +. 4. 4. +.+7  /   3 %&   &       PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.01.30 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-63670-2025 -3- &&%&     (  & &  &    $  &%      % $         %  &  =%      (    &    %   &  $  &&   - %   < %     < &    =    %              %     %&  3          ?&  )    &   &$ &        %&   &  &      &%      &&        $  &   &                    2               &   =  ->  &> %       %&   3         &&$  7   (  !   &   &       &&   5   (  %    &$&&% $   ?  %      %$   &&    &   &    &          &   <& $   ? & PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.01.30 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-63670-2025 -4- &&   %  &&%        (   &&       (   &&     3    &      3     %  $&&& % & & &   % &%      The Court must be circumspect while exercising such power for grant of anticipatory bail and it should not be granted as a matter of rule and has to be granted only when the Court is convinced that exceptional circumstances exist to resort to that extra ordinary remedy. In the present case, no such exceptional circumstances warranting exercise of the powers for grant of anticipatory bail by this Court are existing.   $  %&&  &&&             !                  &&$ Accordingly, the same is dismissed. 8   3 $&     &&   >       *           &   %            40 5           ()&*+,-                            PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.01.30 11:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document