Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- SWP No. 1336/2013 IA No. 1940/2013 IA No. 2307/2013
Sunhak Singh …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (04.03.2025)
01. The instant petition was listed before this Court on 06.06.2013 on which date the notice was issued and since then the case has come up before this Court after twelve years and during this intervening period, the petitioner has not made any effort to get the instant petition listed.
02. Today also, when the case was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
03. Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG submits that the instant petition pertains to Reharbar-i-Taleem which scheme has since been closed. Thus, the relief claimed cannot be granted at this stage.
04. Thus, in the light of the stand taken by the respondent, the instant petition is dismissed.
05. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
04.03.2025
Riya
S. No. 29