Murala Venkateswaramma, v. Vadrevu Vinay Chand, IAS
CC/1140/2025 · 2026-07-14
Challa Gunaranjan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2183 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2183 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010218752025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1140 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-6 [3506]
Murala Venkateswaramma, ...Petitioner Vs. Vadrevu Vinay Chand Ias and Others ...Contemnor(s)
********** Advocate for Petitioner:
SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Advocate(s) for Contemnor(s):
NAGARAJU NAGURU, G V L MURTHY
CORAM : SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 15th July 2026
ORDER:
The present Contempt Case has been preferred alleging violation of the directions issued by Writ Court, in W.P.No.8549 of 2021, wherein, the respondents were directed to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant in Department of Endowment or in the Department of Education as per the seniority fixed vide an order dated 12.09.2019 issued by the Endowments Department and issue appropriate orders in favour of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
2. Heard Sri Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents, has placed on record the proceedings, dated 05.02.2026, whereunder, the case of the writ petitioner has been considered and has now been promoted to the post of Senior Assistant.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the petitioner indeed has been promoted. However, he further contends that despite petitioner being promoted, she has not been paid salary and other consequential benefits.
5. As can be seen from the directions issued in the Writ Petition, the respondents are merely required to promote the petitioner, which now been reported. Insofar as the salary and other benefits are concerned, as there is no specific direction, the petitioner is at liberty to agitate the same in an appropriate proceeding.
6. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date: 15.07.2026 BSM
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN
Contempt Case No: 1140 of 2025
Date: 15.07.2026
BSM