7908.14wp (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 11 WRIT PETITION NO. 7908 OF 2014 RANJIT SANJAY HINGSE VERSUS SANJAY SUKHDEV KALE AND OTHERS …. Mr S. N. Gaikwad, Advocate h/f Mr Niteen V. Gaware, Advocate for petitioner Mr S. P. Mhaske, Advocate h/f Mr R. R. Karpe, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE : 30th June, 2025 PER COURT: 1. Advocate Gaikwad holding for Advocate Gaware, learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the instant petition raising challenge to the order passed in Regular Civil Suit No.93/2013 has become infructuous, since the civil suit itself has been dismissed for want of prosecution on 21/09/2019. 2. Advocate Mhaske, holding for Advocate Karpe, learned counsel for respondent No.1 states on instructions that, no application for restoration of the civil suit is filed. 3. It is to be noted that, on last date, time was sought to ascertain the position of filing of any kind of restoration application. 2025:BHC-AUG:16669 7908.14wp (2) 4. In view of the fact that civil suit itself is dismissed for want of prosecution and no restoration application is filed, the instant petition has become infructuous. 5. The writ petition is therefore disposed of as infructuous. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) sjk