- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20878 WP No. 10743 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.10743 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: MR. SUBRAMANI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE AYYAPPA, R/AT B.R. KAVAL VILLAGE, HANAGODU HOBLI, HUNSUR TAULK - 571 106. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHANA CHANDRA P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU - 570 011. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER HUSNURU SUB DIVISION, HUNSUR - 571 105. 3. THE TASHILDAR TALUK OFFICE, HUNSUR - 571 105. 4. MR. MANJESH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O MADEGOWDA, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20878 WP No. 10743 of 2024 R/AT HANAGODU HOBLI, HUNSUR - 571 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 06.02.2024 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN ITS PROCEEDING NO.RP 54/2022 RD 0050000376709 VIDE ANNEXURE-L. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Sri. Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 06.02.2024 (Annexure-L) passed by respondent No.1. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20878 WP No. 10743 of 2024 4. Having taken note of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate, it is noted that, petitioner herein has challenged the entry in M.R.H.No.30/2011-12 before respondent No.2, wherein the entry has been made in favour of respondent No.4 herein. The respondent No.2, as per order dated 23.02.2022 (Annexure-H) allowed the appeal in part and accordingly, quashed the M.R.H.30/2011-12 dated 07.06.2012, passed by the Tahsildar - respondent No.3 herein. Feeling aggrieved, the respondent No.4 herein has filed R.P.No.54/2022 before respondent No.1. The respondent No.1, after considering the material on record, vide order dated 06.02.2024 (Annexure-L), accepted the revision petition filed by respondent No.4 herein and directed the parties to await the result in O.S.No.3348/2016. 5. In the backdrop of these aspects, wherein the petitioner herein claims right in respect of the land in question on the ground that original grantee is the uncle of the petitioner herein. The respondent No.4 herein is claiming right in respect of the subject land as per Will dated 29.12.2009. In that view - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20878 WP No. 10743 of 2024 of the matter, taking into consideration that rights of the parties is required to be adjudicated in O.S.No.3348/2016, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is rejected. However, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent authority after the conclusion of the aforesaid suit, before the competent forum, if so necessitated. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33