IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9069 of 2023 Date of Decision: 03.07.2025 _______________________________________________________ Alaka Verma …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others ….Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Surender Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that on account of subsequent development, present petition has rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. p` (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 03, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?