2025:CGHC:22937 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3628 of 2025 Smt. Seema Thakur W/o Late Rajesh Thakur Aged About 47 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (L.B.) In Swami Atmanand English Medium School, Kharsiya, Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Secretary Department Of Finance, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G) 6 - District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 7 - Block Education Officer Kharsiya, District Raigarh (C.G.) 8 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Ms Akanksha Singh, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri KS Saini, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 10.06.2025 1. The claim of the petitioner in this petition is with regard to grant of 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. Wps 3628 of 2025 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that with regard to award of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some Circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division of this Court in case of Smt Sona Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others in WA-261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. Petitioner is also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to respondents-1, 4 and 6/competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA-261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make representation raising all grounds as raised in this writ petition to respondents- 1, 4 and 6/competent authority annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA-261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents- - 1, 4 and 6/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the Circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA-261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of this case, and it is for respondents- 1, 4 and 6 to consider the claim of petitioner on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.06.12 11:18:16 +0530