Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21804 (KAR)

SMT. PUSHPA M.S v. THE KLM AXIVA FINVEST LTD

WP/10466/2025 · 2025-04-21

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16243 WP No. 10466 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.10466 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. PUSHPA M.S. W/O SRI. VENKATARAJU AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/O. TATAGUNI VILLAGE AND POST KAVERINAGARA, BENGALURU-560062. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SHYAMALA, ADV., FOR SRI. V.R. BALARAJ, ADV.,) AND: THE KLM AXIVA FINVEST LTD., KONANAKUNTE BRANCH DOOR.NO.30/1, 1ST FLOOR SOUDAMINI KALYANAMANDAPAM, OPP. RELIANCE FRESH AMRITHA NAGAR MAIN ROAD KONANANKUNTE, BENGALURU -560062 REP. BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER …RESPONDENT - - - THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION /E-MAIL OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 17.02.2025 PRODUCED AT ANNX-F AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO ISSUE RELIEVING LETTER TO THE PETITIONER & ETC. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16243 WP No. 10466 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer: "Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation/E-mail of the petitioner dated 17.02.2025 produced at Annexure-F and consequently direct the respondent to issue relieving letter to the petitioner." 2. The prayer of the petitioner is to set aside an order of termination passed by a private entity. Therefore, a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not lie as a private entity is not a State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The learned counsel for the petitioner further seeks to clarify that it is not the termination that is called in question but despite termination, the relieving letter is not issued. Even this grievance cannot be entertained at the hands of this Court as the writ itself could not be entertainable against a private entity. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16243 WP No. 10466 of 2025 3. Leaving open the remedy available in law, the petition stands disposed. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 123